Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1685/2014 AI generated

Mootness of a jurisdiction transfer request following the final resolution of the underlying civil proceedings

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1685/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petitioner's request for the transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) for a civil case pending at the Bacău District Court. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to relocate the trial from its assigned court to another competent forum. The court ruled that the request had become moot (rămasă fără obiect) because the underlying litigation was already resolved by a final judgment on March 12, 2014, rendering any subsequent transfer of jurisdiction legally unnecessary and ineffective.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Mootness of a jurisdiction transfer request following the final resolution of the underlying civil proceedings: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul Z.N. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 10240/180/2008* al Judecătoriei Bacău.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot civil dispute pending proceedings declining of jurisdiction transfer of custody decisions concerning reassignment or transfer
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 1158/2013
Mootness of jurisdiction transfer request following final resolution of underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 1002/2014
Mootness of jurisdiction transfer request following prior final judgment in underlying civil proceedings
Încheierea nr. 4984/2013
Mootness of jurisdiction transfer request following final resolution of underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 2875/2013
Mootness of jurisdiction transfer request due to prior resolution of underlying civil appeal
Încheierea nr. 6903/2012
Mootness of civil jurisdiction transfer request following final resolution of underlying appeal

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Magistratul asistent face raportul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, litigiul care face obiectul cererii de strămutare a fost soluționat la data de 12 martie 2014.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul Z.N. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 10240/180/2008* al Judecătoriei Bacău.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 29 mai 2014.