Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1651/2014 AI generated

Transfer of venue granted to Buzău court to ensure impartiality, procedural acts preserved

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1651/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Court Costs No costs imposed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the joined requests for transfer of venue and ordered that the case in File No. 603/188/2009* be transferred from the Bicaz Court of First Instance to the Buzău Court of First Instance, preserving all procedural acts already performed and declaring the decision final and not subject to appeal. The court joined File No. 1649/1/2014 to File No. 1587/1/2014 because they had identical objects, pursuant to Article 364 of the Code of Civil Procedure, after noting that the petition was legally stamped; the petitioner's counsel supported the transfer, while the Public Ministry opposed it. The ruling was based on the statutory grounds for changing venue to ensure impartiality, with the court providing no further reasoning in the excerpted text.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 364 C. proc. civ; Transfer of venue granted to Buzău court to ensure impartiality, procedural acts preserved: 603/188/2009* be transferred from the Bicaz Court of First Instance to the Buzău Court of First Instance, preserving all procedural acts already performed and declaring the decision final and not subject to appeal. The court joined File No. 1649/1/2014 to File No. 1587/1/2014 because they had identical objects, pursuant to Article 364 of the Code of Civil Procedure, after noting that the petition was legally stamped; the petitioner's counsel supported the transfer, while the Public Ministry opposed it. The ruling was based on the statutory grounds for changing venue to ensure impartiality, with the court providing no further reasoning in the excerpted text.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds for cassation Civil Procedure Code public order grounds procedural orders unity of proceedings e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 364 C. proc. civ
Basis for the joinder of the two connected cases, applied in the dispositive order.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3175/2012
Venue transfer granted from Buzău Tribunal to Harghita Tribunal for impartiality; procedural acts preserved, decision final and unappealable.
Încheierea nr. 1211/2013
Transfer of venue petition admitted and case remanded to Buzău Tribunal
Încheierea nr. 6646/2012
Transfer of venue granted from Pitești Court to Buzău Court with procedural acts preserved; motion to change venue.
Încheierea nr. 49/2014
Transfer of civil jurisdiction to Buzau Court based on statutory grounds for venue change
Încheierea nr. 4258/2013
Transfer of civil proceedings to another court to safeguard impartiality

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 364 C. proc. civ.

Basis for the joinder of the two connected cases, applied in the dispositive order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a arătat și că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 603/188/2009* al Judecătoriei Bicaz, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la data de 11 iunie 2014.

Înalta Curte a pus în discuția părților conexarea Dosarului 1649/1/2014 la Dosarul 1587/1/2014, acestea având obiecte identice.

Avocat S.C., pentru petent, a arătat că este de acord cu conexarea celor doua cauze.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public a arătat că nu se opune conexării celor două cauze.

Deliberând, Înalta Curte a dispus conexarea Dosarului nr. 1649/1/2014, la Dosarul nr. 1587/1/2014, față de dispozițiile art. 364 C. proc. civ.

Nemaifiind alte chestiuni, instanța a constatat că cererea ce face obiectul dosarului conexat este legal timbrată și a acordat cuvântul reprezentantului Ministerului Public în dezbaterea cererilor de strămutare conexate.

Avocat S.C., pentru petent, a depus delegație de reprezentare și înscrisuri, solicitând admiterea cererilor conexe pentru motivele invocate în scris și prezentate verbal.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public a solicitat respingerea cererilor de strămutare conexe, pentru motivele invocate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererile conexe formulate de petentul O.V. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 603/188/2009* al Judecătoriei Bicaz.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Judecătoria Bicaz la Judecătoria Buzău.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 29 mai 2014.