Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1509/2014 AI generated

Venue transfer motion sent to Court of Appeal as proper forum for district court case.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1509/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (civil section) declined its own jurisdiction and transferred the case to the Ploiești Court of Appeal, which was ordered to hear the motion to transfer venue (strămutare) of a case pending before the Ploiești District Court. The motion sought to move a file registered on 27 August 2013, which fell under the new Code of Civil Procedure (in force since 15 February 2013). The court held that, under Articles 24, 131, and 142(1) of the new Code, a request for venue transfer based on legitimate suspicion is within the exclusive competence of the court of appeal when the originating court is a district court or tribunal in its circuit; therefore, the Ploiești Court of Appeal was the proper forum. The ruling was final (definitivă).

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 142 C. proc. civ, art. 131 C. proc. civ, art. 24 C. proc. civ; Venue transfer motion sent to Court of Appeal as proper forum for district court case: The motion sought to move a file registered on 27 August 2013, which fell under the new Code of Civil Procedure (in force since 15 February 2013). The court held that, under Articles 24, 131, and 142(1) of the new Code, a request for venue transfer based on legitimate suspicion is within the exclusive competence of the court of appeal when the originating court is a district court or tribunal in its circuit; therefore, the Ploiești Court of Appeal was the proper forum. The ruling was final (definitivă).

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code declining of jurisdiction transfer of competence e-justice civil register local access to the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 142 C. proc. civ
The court relied on this provision to determine that the request for transfer of the case falls under the competence of the Curtea de Apel Ploiești.
art. 131 C. proc. civ
This procedural rule was applied in the dispositive to establish that the court must verify its own jurisdiction, leading to the declination of competence.
art. 24 C. proc. civ
Cited in the dispositive to determine the applicable procedural law based on the date the case was filed.
AI generated
Sentința nr. 299/2013
Venue transfer motion referred to Ploiești Court of Appeal for lack of High Court jurisdiction
Sentința nr. 1052/2013
Change of venue motion transferred to Cluj Court of Appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Încheierea nr. 4294/2012
Transfer of venue from one appellate court to another in a civil dispute
Sentința nr. 912/2013
Venue transfer request reallocated to appellate court under new jurisdiction rules.
Decizia nr. 2556/2014
Transfer motion referred to Ploiești Court of Appeal under Art. 142(1) Civil Procedure Code.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 142 C. proc. civ.

The court relied on this provision to determine that the request for transfer of the case falls under the competence of the Curtea de Apel Ploiești.

art. 131 C. proc. civ.

This procedural rule was applied in the dispositive to establish that the court must verify its own jurisdiction, leading to the declination of competence.

art. 24 C. proc. civ.

Cited in the dispositive to determine the applicable procedural law based on the date the case was filed.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constatată că se solicită strămutarea unui dosar aflat pe rolul Judecătoriei Ploiești, având ca obiect o acțiune înregistrată la data de 27 august 2013, după data intrării în vigoare a noului C. proc. civ., respectiv 15 februarie 2013;

Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 142 alin. (1) din noul C. proc. civ. „cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitimă este de competența curții de apel, dacă instanța de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripția acesteia”;

În aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 24, art. 131 și art. 142 C. proc. civ., instanța competentă material a soluționa cauza este Curtea de Apel Ploiești, în favoarea căreia urmează a se declina competența de soluționare a pricinii.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Declină competența de soluționare a cauzei ce privește cererea de strămutare a Dosarului nr, 19282/281/2013 al Judecătoriei Ploiești, formulată de potentul D.M., în contradictoriu cu intimata Judecătoria Ploiești, secția penală, și curatorul D.D., în favoarea Curții de Apel Ploiești.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 20 mai 2014.