Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1300/2014 AI generated

Transfer of case over legitimate suspicion assigned to Bacău Court of Appeal, High Court declinings jurisdiction

Case Number Decizia nr. 1300/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) declined its own jurisdiction and referred the case to the Bacău Court of Appeal, ruling that the Bacău Court of Appeal—not the High Court—is the competent court to decide the request for the transfer (strămutare) of a case pending before the Piatra Neamț District Court. The underlying dispute involves a request to transfer a file registered on 11 March 2014, after the entry into force of the new Civil Procedure Code (15 February 2013), based on a claim of legitimate suspicion (bănuială legitimă). The decisive legal basis is Article 142(1) of the new Civil Procedure Code, which vests jurisdiction over transfer requests based on legitimate suspicion in the court of appeal if the court from which transfer is sought is a district court or tribunal within its circuit; applied together with Articles 24 and 131, this made the Bacău Court of Appeal the material competent court. The decision is final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ, Art. 24 C. proc. civ, Art. 131 C. proc. civ; Transfer of case over legitimate suspicion assigned to Bacău Court of Appeal, High Court declinings jurisdiction: The underlying dispute involves a request to transfer a file registered on 11 March 2014, after the entry into force of the new Civil Procedure Code (15 February 2013), based on a claim of legitimate suspicion (bănuială legitimă). The decisive legal basis is Article 142(1) of the new Civil Procedure Code, which vests jurisdiction over transfer requests based on legitimate suspicion in the court of appeal if the court from which transfer is sought is a district court or tribunal within its circuit; applied together with Articles 24 and 131, this made the Bacău Court of Appeal the material competent court. The decision is final.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction transfer of competence article of civil procedure transfer of evidence civil register transfer of tenancy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Main ground for the ruling: establishes that the request for transfer based on legitimate suspicion is within the competence of the court of appeal.
Art. 24 C. proc. civ
Procedural rule applied to determine the applicable law, leading to the application of the new code.
Art. 131 C. proc. civ
Procedural rule applied to determine material competence before deciding on the declination of jurisdiction.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4756/2013
Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal; High Court declines jurisdiction.
Decizia nr. 968/2019
Jurisdiction for transfer of case based on legitimate suspicion: High Court lacks competence for cases registered under New Civil Procedure Code, referral to appellate court
Decizia nr. 1376/2021
Transfer request for legitimate suspicion referred to Bacău Court of Appeal on material competence grounds
Decizia nr. 356/2017
Case transfer for legitimate suspicion declined; Court of Appeal Bacău held competent.
Decizia nr. 3755/2018
Competence to Adjudicate Motion for Transfer of Case Based on Legitimate Suspicion

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Main ground for the ruling: establishes that the request for transfer based on legitimate suspicion is within the competence of the court of appeal.

Art. 24 C. proc. civ.

Procedural rule applied to determine the applicable law, leading to the application of the new code.

Art. 131 C. proc. civ.

Procedural rule applied to determine material competence before deciding on the declination of jurisdiction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constatată că se solicită strămutarea unui dosar aflat pe rolul Judecătoriei Piatra Neamț, având ca obiect o acțiune înregistrată la data de 11 martie 2014, după data intrării în vigoare a noului C. proc. civ., respectiv 15 februarie 2013;

Potrivit dispozițiilor art. 142 alin. (1) din noul C. proc. civ. „cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitima este de competența curții de apel, dacă instanța de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripția acesteia”;

În aplicarea dispozițiilor art. 24, art. 131 și art. 142 din noul C. proc. civ., instanța competentă material a soluționa cauza este Curtea de Apel Bacău în favoarea căreia urmează a se declina competența de soluționare a pricinii.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Declină competența de soluționare a cauzei ce privește cererea de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 2177/279/2014 al Judecătoriei Piatra Neamț, formulată de petentul B.A., în contradictoriu cu intimații C.C., C.N., C.N.V., B.F. și A.G., toți cu domiciliul în comuna B., sat B., județul Neamț, precum și cu intimata P.M., cu domiciliul în comuna B., sat B., județul Neamț, în favoarea Curții de Apel Bacău.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 6 mai 2014.