Denial of case transfer request based on statutory suspension of civil proceedings
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the motion filed by the applicant to transfer (strămutare) case no. 10417/225/2012 from the Drobeta Turnu Severin Court, thereby allowing the proceedings to remain at the original venue and prevailing for the respondent and the public prosecutor who opposed the transfer. The dispute arose from a procedural request to move a civil case based on grounds formulated by the applicant, but the court noted that the case was already suspended pursuant to Article 244(1), point 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural status of the underlying case as suspended and the written notes submitted by the respondent, which, in conjunction with the prosecutor's opposition, led the panel to conclude that the transfer was not warranted.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 244 alin. (1) pct. 1 din C. proc. civ; Denial of case transfer request based on statutory suspension of civil proceedings: 10417/225/2012 from the Drobeta Turnu Severin Court, thereby allowing the proceedings to remain at the original venue and prevailing for the respondent and the public prosecutor who opposed the transfer. The dispute arose from a procedural request to move a civil case based on grounds formulated by the applicant, but the court noted that the case was already suspended pursuant to Article 244(1), point 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural status of the underlying case as suspended and the written notes submitted by the respondent, which, in conjunction with the prosecutor's opposition, led the panel to conclude that the transfer was not warranted.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited in the dispositive section to establish that the case is suspended, which formed the basis for the court's decision to dismiss the request for transfer of jurisdiction.
Full text
Magistratul asistent face referatul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită este suspendat, în temeiul art. 244 alin. (1) pct. 1 din C. proc. civ. Se mai referă că intimatul l.l.A. a depus note scrise, înregistrate la 13 mai 2013.
Petentul depune înscrisuri în susținerea cererii și solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, conform motivelor formulate în scris și prezentate verbal.
Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.
Analizând cererea,
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
D I S P U N E
Respinge cererea formulată de petentul F.H.N. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 10417/225/2012 al Judecătoriei Drobeta Turnu Severin.
Fără cale de atac.
Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 23 mai 2013.