Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 2975/2012 AI generated

Transfer of civil jurisdiction for bias: admissibility grounds and jurisdictional competence

Case Number Încheierea nr. 2975/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction of the underlying case, ruling in favor of the opposing parties; the petition for the transfer of Case No. 1344/100/2012 from the Maramures Tribunal was rejected, and this decision is final with no further appeal. The dispute involved a procedural application filed by a civil party requesting the transfer of a pending civil matter to a different court, while the respondent parties were absent and the Public Ministry represented by a prosecutor opposed the request. The Court’s decisive legal basis was the statutory requirement that a petition for transfer of jurisdiction is only admissible when specific grounds for bias or improper composition are proven; since the underlying case had a scheduled hearing in June 2012 and no such grounds were established to override the competent court's jurisdiction, the Court upheld the original forum.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of civil jurisdiction for bias: admissibility grounds and jurisdictional competence: Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 1344/100/2012 al Tribunalului Maramureș a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen la 20 iunie 2012.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction transfer of competence civil dispute hearing of the parties transfer of evidence procedural requirement
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petentul C.P.

La apelul nominal lipsesc petentul C.P. și intimații P.E.L. și C.I.

Ministerul Public este reprezentat de procuror Ș.S.

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 1344/100/2012 al Tribunalului Maramureș a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen la 20 iunie 2012.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 1344/100/2012 al Tribunalului Maramureș, formulată de petentul C.P.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 mai 2012.

Procesat de GGC - NN