Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2277/2003 AI generated

Withdrawal of appeal after filing motion to resume case following death of party

Case Number Decizia nr. 2277/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took formal act of the appellant's waiver of appeal, rendering the decision irrevocable, thereby leaving the Court of Appeal's suspension of the litigation in force. The case involved a civil proceeding where the Court of Appeal had suspended the trial of an appeal due to the death of a party pursuant to Article 243(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the appellant subsequently argued that lack of communication had necessitated the appeal but concurrently filed a motion to resume the case, leading to the withdrawal of the current appeal as it no longer had an object. The court applied Article 246(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure to record the waiver, confirming that the procedural status of the underlying litigation remains suspended pending the resolution of the motion to resume.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 243 pct.1 C. proc. civ, art. 246 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Withdrawal of appeal after filing motion to resume case following death of party: The case involved a civil proceeding where the Court of Appeal had suspended the trial of an appeal due to the death of a party pursuant to Article 243(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the appellant subsequently argued that lack of communication had necessitated the appeal but concurrently filed a motion to resume the case, leading to the withdrawal of the current appeal as it no longer had an object. The court applied Article 246(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure to record the waiver, confirming that the procedural status of the underlying litigation remains suspended pending the resolution of the motion to resume.

Keywords

AI generated
article of civil procedure procedural act withdrawal of legal petition effects of the judgment formal legal force waiver of right

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 243 pct.1 C. proc. civ
2858/2001 prin care în temeiul art. 243 pct.1 C. proc. civ.
art. 246 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Procedural rule applied to take act of the appellant's waiver of the appeal, which serves as the basis for the final order.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3698/2018
Peremption of administrative appeal following suspension due to party's death
Decizia nr. 2469/2020
Withdrawal of appeal against dismissal of reinstatement request; application of party autonomy in civil procedure
Decizia nr. 2127/2022
Civil Recourse Peremption Due to Six-Month Inactivity Following Party Death and Suspension of Proceedings
Decizia nr. 2143/2023
Peremption of appeal after suspension of proceedings due to defendant's death in a public-appeals collaboration status case.
Decizia nr. 808/2014
Procedural suspension for death of party: quashed refusal to resume case for violating active role principle and remanded

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 246 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Procedural rule applied to take act of the appellant's waiver of the appeal, which serves as the basis for the final order.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

D E C I Z I A Nr. 2277 Dosar nr. 4797/2002

Ședința publică de la 30 mai 2003

Asupra recursului de față.

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

D.T. a atacat cu recurs încheierea Curții de Apel București, secția a IV-a civilă, pronunțată la 16 septembrire 2002 în dosarul nr. 2858/2001 prin care în temeiul art. 243 pct.1 C. proc. civ. s-a suspendat judecata recursului aflat pe rol, în urma decesului uneia dintre părțile litigante, D.V.

La termenul din 30 mai 2002, prezent în instanță, recurentul a depus o precizare în scris din care rezultă că lipsa de comunicare cu avocatul său și cu instanța l-au determinat să promoveze prezentul recurs, în realitate formulând între timp cerere de repunere a cauzei pe rol.

A solicitat a se lua act că renunță la prezentul recurs, care nu mai are obiect.

Curtea, văzând și poziția procesuală a celorlalte părți prezente, urmează a lua act, potrivit art. 246 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., de renunțarea la prezentul recurs.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Ia act de renunțarea la judecarea recursului.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 30 mai 2003.