Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 574/2014 AI generated

Strămutare request referred to Court of Appeal for lack of material competence

Case Number Decizia nr. 574/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the exception of material incompetence and declined jurisdiction, referring the case to the Court of Appeal Galați as the competent jurisdiction. The dispute concerned a motion for the transfer of a case (strămوتare) filed by a petitioner against a defendant, which the Court assessed as falling outside its competence under the procedural rules. Relying on Article 142(1) of the new Code of Civil Procedure, which assigns motions for transfer based on legitimate suspicion against a court within the appellate court's jurisdiction to that appellate court, and applying Article 129(2) point 2 of the same Code ex officio, the Court determined it was not the proper forum to hear the request, thereby definitively transferring the matter to the designated appellate body.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 129 alin. (2) pct. 2 C. proc. civ; Strămutare request referred to Court of Appeal for lack of material competence: The dispute concerned a motion for the transfer of a case (strămوتare) filed by a petitioner against a defendant, which the Court assessed as falling outside its competence under the procedural rules. Relying on Article 142(1) of the new Code of Civil Procedure, which assigns motions for transfer based on legitimate suspicion against a court within the appellate court's jurisdiction to that appellate court, and applying Article 129(2) point 2 of the same Code ex officio, the Court determined it was not the proper forum to hear the request, thereby definitively transferring the matter to the designated appellate body.

Keywords

AI generated
matter in dispute lack of jurisdiction transfer of competence article of civil procedure rules of procedure standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 129 alin. (2) pct. 2 C. proc. civ
The procedural rule applied to admit the exception of incompetence and decline jurisdiction in favor of the Court of Appeal Galați.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2539/2018
Court of Appeal to rule on case transfer request after High Court declares itself materially incompetent.
Decizia nr. 989/2017
Transfer request for legitimate suspicion sent to appellate court over High Court for lack of material competence.
Decizia nr. 596//2017
Jurisdictional transfer motion declined and remanded to appellate court due to lack of material competence
Decizia nr. 1158/2017
Jurisdictional contest over transfer request sent to Court of Appeal; High Court lacks material competence.
Decizia nr. 2860/2018
Material incompetence accepted; appeal against tribunal ruling referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 129 alin. (2) pct. 2 C. proc. civ.

The procedural rule applied to admit the exception of incompetence and decline jurisdiction in favor of the Court of Appeal Galați.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constatând că, potrivit dispozițiilor art. 142 alin. (1) din noul C. proc. civ. în raport de care "cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitimă este de competența curții de apel, dacă instanța de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripția acesteia", Înalta Curte va face aplicarea art. 129 alin. (2) pct. 2 C. proc. civ. și va admite excepția invocată din oficiu. Pe cale de consecință, va declina competența de soluționare a cererii de strămutare, în favoarea Curții de Apel Galați.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Admite excepția necompetenței materiale.

Declină competența de soluționare a cauzei, cerere de strămutare formulată de petenta S.M., domiciliată în Comuna P., sat P., jud. Vrancea, în contradictoriu cu S.N., domiciliat în comuna P., sat P., jud. Vrancea, în favoarea Curții de Apei Galați.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi, 18 februarie 2014.

Procesat de GGC - AZ