Încheierea nr. 6864/2012 AI generated

Rejection of application to transfer civil case venue for conflicting hearing schedules

Case Number Încheierea nr. 6864/2012

Court / Authority Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Secţia I civilă

Jurisdiction

Romania (RO)

Decision Date 2012-11-08

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the transfer application filed by the plaintiff, leaving the jurisdictional dispute without a change in venue and issuing a final order without appeal. The case involved a procedural motion to transfer a civil lawsuit, identified by a specific case number from the Court of Appeal, from its current instance to a different court. The court denied the request after the prosecutor concluded against the transfer, citing the legal insufficiency of the grounds for changing the competent court despite the existence of an upcoming hearing date.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Rejection of application to transfer civil case venue for conflicting hearing schedules: Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la data de 28 noiembrie 2012.

Keywords

AI generated

civil jurisdictional conflict grounds for cassation procedural issues decisions concerning reassignment or transfer transfer of tenancy dismissal and abandonment of proceedings

AI generated

Încheierea nr. 6408/2012

Rejection of venue transfer request for pending civil case despite scheduled hearing date

Încheierea nr. 266/2013

Transfer of venue for pending civil litigation rejected due to scheduled hearing date

Încheierea nr. 4386/2012

Civil case transfer request: rejection based on lack of grounds and existing hearing schedule

Încheierea nr. 1370/2014

Application for transfer of civil proceedings: dismissal of venue change request despite pending oral pleadings and written defenses

Încheierea nr. 1785/2012

Civil proceeding transfer: rejection of subsequent venue change request based on newly asserted grounds