Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 308/2014 AI generated

Mootness of transfer venue motion where underlying civil case already adjudicated

Case Number Încheierea nr. 308/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Section I Civil) dismissed the applicant's motion for transfer of venue, ruling that the request was procedurally deficient and without remedy for appeal. The dispute concerned a motion to transfer the jurisdiction of civil case No. 7372/105/2013 from the Prahova District Court, where both the applicant and the respondent association of property owners were absent from the hearing. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the finding that the underlying case had already been adjudicated and resolved by a final decision issued on December 4, 2013, thereby rendering the motion for transfer moot and unnecessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Mootness of transfer venue motion where underlying civil case already adjudicated: The dispute concerned a motion to transfer the jurisdiction of civil case No. 7372/105/2013 from the Prahova District Court, where both the applicant and the respondent association of property owners were absent from the hearing. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the finding that the underlying case had already been adjudicated and resolved by a final decision issued on December 4, 2013, thereby rendering the motion for transfer moot and unnecessary.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot civil dispute lack of jurisdiction procedural issues dismissal and abandonment of proceedings settlement of charges on property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Imposes costs or rules on legal aid as part of the final operative orders.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 3868/2012
Mootness of transfer of venue request due to prior resolution of underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 3587/2013
Mootness of venue transfer petition due to prior final resolution of the underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 4867/2012
Mootness of venue transfer request following prior resolution of the underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 3870/2012
Mootness of motion to transfer trial venue due to prior adjudication of civil case
Încheierea nr. 858/2014
Mootness of venue transfer motion due to concurrent final judgment in underlying civil case

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes costs or rules on legal aid as part of the final operative orders.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petentul I.D.

La apelul nominal au lipsit atât petentul I.D. cât și intimata Asociația de Proprietari Aleea Pajurei.

Ministerului Public este reprezentat de procuror Ș.S.

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea a fost timbrată corespunzător.

Magistratul asistent face raportul cauzei și arată că cererea de strămutare a fost comunicată intimaților; potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor - ECRIS, Dosarul nr. 7372/105/2013, care face obiectul cererii de strămutare, se află pe rolul Tribunalului Prahova și a fost soluționat la data de 04 decembrie 2013, prin decizia nr. 1620.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul I.D. prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 7372/105/2013 al Tribunalului Prahova.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 30 ianuarie 2014.