Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 113/2014 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction for land fund litigation: dismissal for lack of statutory grounds

Case Number Încheierea nr. 113/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant’s request for the transfer of jurisdiction, thereby allowing the original case to proceed before the Maramureș Court of Appeal as scheduled. The dispute concerned a procedural petition for the relocation of a lawsuit concerning the application of the State Land Fund Law, in which the applicant argued for a different competent court while the opposing parties and the Public Prosecutor advocated for the maintenance of the current jurisdiction. Relying on the specific legal provisions governing the conditions and grounds for transferring cases between courts, the court determined that the statutory requirements for such a transfer were not met, resulting in the upholding of the original court’s competence without the possibility of appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 544-547 C. proc. civ, Art. 458 C. proc. civ; Transfer of jurisdiction for land fund litigation: dismissal for lack of statutory grounds: The dispute concerned a procedural petition for the relocation of a lawsuit concerning the application of the State Land Fund Law, in which the applicant argued for a different competent court while the opposing parties and the Public Prosecutor advocated for the maintenance of the current jurisdiction. Relying on the specific legal provisions governing the conditions and grounds for transferring cases between courts, the court determined that the statutory requirements for such a transfer were not met, resulting in the upholding of the original court’s competence without the possibility of appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction transfer of competence statutory requirement requested state land reallocation transfer rendered moot

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 544-547 C. proc. civ
Implicitly applied as the main ground for dismissing the transfer request due to lack of statutory grounds.
Art. 458 C. proc. civ
Implicitly applied as the procedural basis for the finality of the decision (no appeal).
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 593/2014
Judicial transfer of civil land fund dispute rejected for lack of grounds
Încheierea nr. 5509/2013
Transfer of jurisdiction request in agricultural land fund litigation denied due to lack of legal grounds
Încheierea nr. 612/2017
Challenge to territorial jurisdiction transfer in land fund application litigation
Încheierea nr. 2843/2013
Civil case transfer jurisdiction request: dismissal for lack of statutory grounds
Încheierea nr. 3591/2013
Request for transfer of civil jurisdiction in land property dispute dismissed for lack of sufficient grounds.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 544-547 C. proc. civ.

Implicitly applied as the main ground for dismissing the transfer request due to lack of statutory grounds.

Art. 458 C. proc. civ.

Implicitly applied as the procedural basis for the finality of the decision (no appeal).

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petentul M.V.

La apelul nominal s~a prezentat petentul personal, lipsind intimații Comisia Locală Recea de Aplicare a Legii Fondului Funciar, Comisia Județeană Maramureș de Aplicare a Legii Fondului Funciar și Pop Ioan Nelu.

Ministerul Public a fost reprezentat de procuror V.L.

Magistratul asistent a făcut referatul cauzei, arătând că procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

S-a arătat și că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 10309/182/2010 al Tribunalului Maramureș, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la data de 26 martie 2014.

Petentul a solicitat admiterea cererii pentru motivele invocate în scris și prezentate verbal.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public a solicitat respingerea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele invocate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul M.V. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 10309/182/2010 al Tribunalului Maramureș.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 16 ianuarie 2014.