Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 4297/2013 AI generated

Transfer of civil proceedings to a different jurisdiction via extraordinary petition for venue change

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4297/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the petition for transfer, ordering the relocation of the civil case from the Bucharest Court of Appeal to the Argeș Court of Appeal while preserving prior procedural acts, resulting in the success of the petitioners. The dispute concerned a procedural motion filed against Case No. 46226/3/2012, seeking to move the trial to a different jurisdiction, with the Public Prosecutor supporting the request. The decision rests on the statutory competence of the High Court to resolve petitions for transfer of jurisdiction, ensuring impartiality or proper administrative handling by reassigning the venue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of civil proceedings to a different jurisdiction via extraordinary petition for venue change: Admite cererea formulată de petentele V.C.C., T.M.A. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 46226/3/2012 al Tribunalului București.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute decisions concerning reassignment or transfer transfer of competence procedural orders administrative acts change of residence
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2554/2014
Transfer of jurisdiction to a different Court of Appeal pursuant to the request for venue change
Încheierea nr. 899/2014
Civil jurisdictional transfer to a different tribunal requested by claimant
Încheierea nr. 939/2013
Transfer of civil jurisdiction: Admissibility of request to move proceedings to a different appellate court
Încheierea nr. 429/2013
Transfer of civil jurisdiction; dismissal of motion for venue change
Încheierea nr. 7281/2012
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction between appellate courts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Magistratul asistent face raportul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 46226/3/2012 al Tribunalului București, ce face obiectul cererii de strămutare, are termen de judecată acordat la 3 februarie 2014.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petentele V.C.C., T.M.A. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 46226/3/2012 al Tribunalului București.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la Tribunalul București, la Tribunalul Argeș.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 7 octombrie 2013.