Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Încheierea nr. 4263/2013 AI generated

Request to transfer jurisdiction rejected because underlying commercial case had already been resolved

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4263/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant’s motion for the removal of jurisdiction (strămutare a pricinii), resulting in the prevailing outcome that the original court retained jurisdiction. The dispute involved a request to transfer a commercial litigation case originally pending before the Cluj Commercial Court, which the applicant argued required a venue change based on grounds formulated in written and oral submissions; however, the procedural history indicated that the underlying case had already been resolved on June 26, 2013. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural status of the underlying case, specifically the fact that the matter was already adjudicated and concluded, rendering the request for a change of venue moot or inadmissible at that stage, with the public prosecutor also recommending rejection.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Request to transfer jurisdiction rejected because underlying commercial case had already been resolved: Respinge cererea formulată de petentul P.S. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 18404/211/2012 al Tribunalului Comercial Cluj.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot jurisdictional matters commercial dispute removal grounds for cassation legal status
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Magistratul asistent face referatul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost soluționat la 26 iunie 2013.

Petentul, prin avocat, solicită admiterea cererii, conform motivelor formulate în scris și prezentate verbal. Depune la dosar copiile unor înscrisuri.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul P.S. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 18404/211/2012 al Tribunalului Comercial Cluj.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 octombrie 2013.