Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0140483 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal confirming that omitting unproven facts does not violate procedural requirements if all alleged facts were analyzed.

Case Number 0140483
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto dismissed the appeal, confirming the lower court's decision regarding the omission of a pronouncement on unproven facts. The defendant argued that the trial judge failed to address specific allegations, while the prosecution contended that the judge had adequately reviewed all presented evidence. The court ruled that since the judge explicitly stated unproven facts lacked relevance and analyzed every allegation, no violation of Article 374, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Procedure Code occurred.

Legislator headnote

Official

SENTENÇA REQUISITOS FUNDAMENTAÇÃO FACTOS OMISSÃO DE PRONÚNCIA

Keywords

AI generated
omission of pronouncement unproven facts Criminal Procedure Code relevance of facts procedural violation trial record analysis appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 374 n.2 do Código de Processo Penal

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ DE 1997/01/15 IN CJSTJ T1 ANOV PAG181

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00032398

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200111070140483

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 109/99

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 2 J CR V N GAIA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/FD2F4E3E08F9C84780256B3D003CD2EE?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Tendo o juiz enumerado na sentença os factos dados como provados e, no que concerne aos factos não provados, dito não se terem provado em audiência quaisquer outros factos com relevância para a decisão da causa, o que inculca a ideia de que todos os factos alegados foram analisados, há que concluir não ter sido violado o artigo 374 n.2 do Código de Processo Penal.