Portuguese court dismisses third-party objections lacking substantive grounds for debt commerciality and marital status. The court rejects the appeal due to insufficient reasoning and the disappearance of the object. The decision upholds the original judgment on procedural and substantive grounds.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tribunal da Relação do Porto unanimously dismissed the appeal against a third-party objection filed by a married woman who was not a party to the execution. The appellant argued that the debt lacked commercial substance and that her marital status entitled her to a moratorium, but the court found these arguments unsubstantiated. The decision was overturned because the original judgment lacked proper reasoning, yet the court noted that the disappearance of the appellant's specific grounds rendered the objection futile.
Legislator headnote
OfficialDECISÃO FALTA DE FUNDAMENTAÇÃO NULIDADE MULHER MORATÓRIA EMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedCited Case Law
AI generatedFull text
[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 03/19/1997 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00022638 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199712099751009 [PRIVACIDADE] 1 [PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 11178-2S [TEXTO INTEGRAL] N [TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T CIV PORTO 4J [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/CF35AC7FFEA85EB58025686B00670809?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO I - Só a ausência total de fundamentação pode gerar a nulidade da decisão.
II - Visando os embargos de terceiro, deduzidos por mulher casada, que não é executada, questionar a comercialidade substancial da dívida, como forma de a embargante vir a beneficiar da moratória, o desaparecimento desta acarreta a inutilidade dos embargos.