Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0409661 AI generated

Third-party seizure objections dismissed as possessory proceedings exclude property date and seizure registration issues.

Case Number 0409661
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court confirmed the lower court's decision to dismiss the third-party seizure objections filed by the appellants. The appellants argued that the seizure and subsequent registration of the property should be reviewed, including the dates of acquisition. The court ruled that possessory seizure objections strictly address current possession and do not permit the examination of historical property dates or registration details unless specifically requested by the objector.

Legislator headnote

Official

EMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO PENHORA REGISTO PREDIAL

Keywords

AI generated
possessory seizure objections third party embargoes property registration dates seizure registration review possessory proceedings scope

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC Art. 1033
CPC Art. 1034
CPC Art. 1037
CPC Art. 1042
CC Art. 1276
CC Art. 1285
CRP Art. 6
CRP Art. 7

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00011991

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199012200409661

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J V N FAMALICÃO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/CDA5C39ADF486AF18025686B00667ADC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Os embargos de terceiro - meio possessório que são ( a não ser que a questão da propriedade deva ser apreciada, mas só a pedido do embargado ) - não permitem que sejam apreciadas as questões relacionadas com as datas da compra pelos embargantes, e da penhora do prédio em causa, bem como os registos dessas aquisição e penhora.