Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9120582 AI generated

Portuguese court dismisses preliminary rejection of partial execution defense due to overpaid fine and procedural defects.

Case Number 9120582
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto dismissed the preliminary rejection of the defendant's partial execution defense. The plaintiff argued for immediate dismissal due to procedural deficiencies and an alleged unpaid fine, while the defendant contended the fine was already overpaid. The court ruled that the preliminary rejection was unjustified because the fine was clearly liquidated at a higher amount than due, and the defendant was properly invited to cure factual deficiencies in their request for legal aid.

Legislator headnote

Official

APOIO JUDICIARIO INDEFERIMENTO LIMINAR DA PETIçãO EMBARGOS DE EXECUTADO PRAZO DE DEFESA MULTA LIQUIDAçãO VALOR DA CAUSA

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary rejection execution defense legal aid deficiency overpaid fine procedural timeline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 145, n.º 6
CPC67 Art. 816
CPC67 Art. 314, n.º 3
CPC67 Art. 685, n.º 1
CPC67 Art. 153
CPC67 Art. 305
CPC67 Art. 477, n.º 1
CCJ62 Art. 8, n.º 1
CCJ62 Art. 22, n.º 2
CCJ62 Art. 16
CCJ62 Art. 211, n.º 1
DL 387/B/87 Art. 26, n.º 2
DL 387/B/87 Art. 26, n.º 1
DL 387/B/87 Art. 23, n.º 2

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ DE 1969/02/21 IN BMJ N184 PAG245

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00000807

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199111269120582

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/C507E8FC2DFD69B08025686B00661EAB?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I- Se um pedido de apoio judiciario apresenta deficiencias relativas a fundamentação factual, o requerente deve ser convidado a supri-las.

II- Sendo os embargos parciais, o seu valor não coincide com o valor da execução, sendo inferior ao desta.

III- Não se justifica a rejeição liminar dos embargos, por falta de pagamento da multa que alongaria o prazo de defesa, quando for manifesto que a multa foi liquidada em montante superior ao devido.