Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0020284 AI generated

Third party sale during seizure allows habilitation if prior objection or probable revocation facts are shown.

Case Number 0020284
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court allowed the third party purchaser to be habilitated in the pending seizure proceeding. The plaintiff argued that the property had been sold to a third party, while the defendant contended that the seizure should remain against the original owner. The court ruled that habilitation is admissible only if the plaintiff demonstrates a prior objection to the sale or facts making a paulian action probable.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROCEDIMENTOS CAUTELARES ARRESTO ALIENAÇÃO HABILITAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
procedural seizure third party sale habilitation of purchaser paulian action prior objection requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC95 Art. 376 n.1
CPC95 Art. 407 n.2
CCIV66 Art. 619 n.1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 12/02/1999

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00029658

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200006060020284

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 520-A/98

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 2 J CIV V N GAIA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/BFAEEF31C98F7C038025696200438DF2?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Se, na pendência de procedimento cautelar de arresto, o prédio a que se dirige a providência for vendido a terceiro, é admissível a habilitação desse terceiro, para efeito de contra ele seguir o procedimento, desde que o requerente demonstre que já impugnou essa alienação ou indique os factos que tornem provável a procedência da impugnação pauliana.