Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0409193 AI generated

Court holds that a party cannot withdraw an arbitration award request after a final decision on boundary demarcation.

Case Number 0409193
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appellant's request to withdraw the arbitration award following a final judgment ordering boundary demarcation. The appellant argued for desistance during the declaratory phase, but the court found this impermissible once the matter had become res judicata. Consequently, the withdrawal was rejected to preserve the finality of the boundary determination and the subsequent expert work.

Legislator headnote

Official

ARBITRAMENTO DEMARCAÇÃO DESISTÊNCIA DO PEDIDO ADMISSIBILIDADE

Keywords

AI generated
arbitration award withdrawal boundary demarcation finality res judicata effect execution phase obstruction desistance after judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC 67, art. 293
CPC 67, art. 1043, n.º 2
CPC 67, art. 1058

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00009761

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199004030409193

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J BARCELOS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/BAD30746EC1892D08025686B00668D1C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Não pode o requerente, na fase declarativa da acção de arbitramento e decidido com trânsito em julgado que havia que proceder à demarcação da linha divisória entre os prédios, desistir desse pedido.

II - E, na fase de índole executiva da referida acção, a desistência do pedido pelo requerente não pode afectar o prosseguimento do processo quanto à acção dos peritos na implantação da linha divisória.