Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9250177 AI generated

Preventive detention appeal dismissed as the defendant was already released following a subsequent release order.

Case Number 9250177
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court declined to examine the appeal challenging the maintenance of preventive detention. The defendant had already been released by a subsequent order under Articles 311 to 313 of the 1987 Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, the appeal was deemed useless and inadmissible because the legal situation regarding the defendant's liberty had already been resolved.

Legislator headnote

Official

PRISÃO PREVENTIVA RECURSO INUTILIDADE SUPERVENIENTE

Keywords

AI generated
preventive detention useless appeal subsequent release order Criminal Procedure Code inadmissibility procedural utility appellate review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Articles 311 to 313 of the 1987 Criminal Procedure Code

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 01/09/1992 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00003631 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199203259250177 [PRIVACIDADE] 1 [PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 239/92 [TEXTO INTEGRAL] N [TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J STO TIRSO [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/B9ACA752ACADE4498025686B00663862?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O recurso interposto do despacho que, reexaminando os pressupostos da prisão preventiva, manteve esta medida de coacção, perde utilidade e, como tal, não deve ser conhecido se, posteriormente, foi proferido o despacho a que se referem os artigos

311 a 313, do Código de Processo Penal de 1987 e aí foi decidido que o arguido se manteria naquela situação.