Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0010681 AI generated

Portuguese court rejects appeal when appellant fails to correct missing formalities in sentencing conclusions.

Case Number 0010681
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto rejected the appellant's appeal because they failed to correct a specific formal defect in their sentencing conclusions. The lower court had identified that the conclusions omitted the mandatory specifications required by Article 412, paragraphs 2, letters a, b, and c, of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the court barred the appellant from altering these terms or introducing new arguments to justify their legal positions.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO MATÉRIA DE DIREITO MOTIVAÇÃO CONCLUSÕES OMISSÃO DE FORMALIDADES

Keywords

AI generated
Code of Criminal Procedure sentencing conclusions formalities omission appeal dismissal procedural bar legal motivation Portuguese law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 2 of the Constitution of 1976
Art. 12 of the Constitution of 1976
Art. 13 of the Constitution of 1976
Art. 412, n.2, alíneas a), b) e c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure
artigo 412 do Código de Processo Penal

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ of 1994/04/19

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 03/20/2000

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00032406

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200111070010681

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 448-A/99

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 1 J CR V N FAMALICÃO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/AF5A85D0EBAAC5EC80256B3D003DFBB7?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Notificado o recorrente para suprir o vício, detectado nas conclusões de motivação, que não continham as especificações enunciadas nas alíneas a) a c) do n.2 do artigo 412 do Código de Processo Penal, está-lhe vedado alterar os termos das anteriores conclusões, nomeadamente, aduzindo novos argumentos na sustentação das suas teses.