Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0131699 AI generated

Arrest extinguished by non-execution within two months; court rules this is a condition, not true caducity.

Case Number 0131699
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding the extinction of an arrest due to the failure to execute the judgment within two months. The appellant argued this constituted true caducity, while the court distinguished it as merely creating a condition for extinction rather than extinguishing the right to execute. Consequently, the court held that the arrest was validly extinguished by the passage of time without execution, not by the loss of the right to sue.

Legislator headnote

Official

ARRESTO EXTINÇÃO EXECUÇÃO CADUCIDADE

Keywords

AI generated
arrest extinction execution deadline caducity distinction final judgment civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CCIV66 Art. 328
CPC95 Art. 410

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00033289

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200111290131699

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 899-D/97-3S

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 9 V CIV PORTO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/AE437ACFADA211A080256B5A0035385C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A extinção do arresto por não ter sido proposta a execução no prazo de dois meses após o trânsito em julgado da sentença condenatória, não é um verdadeiro prazo de caducidade, porque o direito de propor a execução não se extinguiu, apenas se criou uma condição de extinção do arresto.