Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9150625 AI generated

Court holds that a restrictive answer to a question is distinct from a deficient answer in civil procedure.

Case Number 9150625
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto confirmed the lower court's sentence regarding a restrictive answer to a judicial question. The appellant argued this response constituted a deficiency warranting reversal, while the respondent maintained it was a valid, albeit limited, admission. The court ruled that a restrictive answer differs fundamentally from a deficient one, upholding the original judgment.

Legislator headnote

Official

RESTITUIÇÃO DE POSSE RESPOSTAS AOS QUESITOS

Keywords

AI generated
restrictive answer deficient answer judicial question civil procedure appeal decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 653, n.º 5

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 04/22/1991 [Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00006435 [Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199202189150625 [PRIVACIDADE] 1 [PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 85/89 [TEXTO INTEGRAL] N [TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J V REAL 1J [URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/9DAF51CB41EC53428025686B00665C5F?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO Uma resposta restritiva a um quesito não é a mesma coisa que uma resposta deficiente.