Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0220095 AI generated

Failure to notify a party violates the principle of contradiction and invalidates the auction execution. The appeal was dismissed due to this procedural irregularity. The court ruled that notification is essential for exercising rights regarding the sale and valuation of seized assets.

Case Number 0220095
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto dismissed the appeal against the execution of a sale, ruling that the failure to notify an interested party constituted a procedural irregularity. The plaintiff argued that the auction proceeded without allowing the unnotified party to exercise their right of contradiction regarding the sale method and asset valuation. The court held that such notification is mandatory under the Civil Procedure Code to ensure due process, thereby invalidating the execution's procedural foundation.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXECUÇÃO VENDA PRINCÍPIO DO CONTRADITÓRIO IRREGULARIDADE

Keywords

AI generated
execution sale principle of contradiction procedural irregularity notification requirement asset valuation rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 886-A n.1 CPC
Art. 201 n.1 CPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00034811

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200206110220095

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 67-B/97

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 3 J CIV BARCELOS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/963BAB5FE90AAAA280256C4700373CDC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A não notificação de um dos interessados nos termos do artigo 886-A n.1 do Código de Processo Civil constitui irregularidade, com influência na execução, por não permitir o exercício do contraditório no que respeita à modalidade da venda e eventual determinação do valor dos bens penhorados.