Legislator Case Law & Legislation
9551181 AI generated

No pending litigation exists between bankruptcy and company recovery if the bankruptcy claim postdates the creditors' assembly approving the concordat.

Case Number 9551181
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto allowed the appeal, ruling that no pending litigation exists between the bankruptcy and company recovery proceedings under specific conditions. The court found that the bankruptcy claim was based on a credit arising after the creditors' assembly approved the concordat, while the recovery process was initiated under the old Decreto-Lei 177/86. Consequently, the court held that the temporal gap and the distinct legal regimes prevented the proceedings from being considered litispendent.

Legislator headnote

Official

FALÊNCIA RECUPERAÇÃO DE EMPRESA LITISPENDÊNCIA

Keywords

AI generated
litispendência falência recuperação de empresa crédito posterior Assembleia de Credores Decreto-Lei 177/86 concordata

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 498
CPC67 Art. 1174
DL 177/86 Art. 1
DL 177/86 Art. 3

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00018431

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199605139551181

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 139/95-2

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J MARCO CANAVESES

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/93CD02090FE8EAA88025686B0066D889?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Não ocorre litispendência entre o processo de falência e o processo de recuperação de empresa se o requerente da falência a fundamenta em crédito posterior à data da Assembleia de Credores que aprovou a concordata e cujo processo foi instaurado quando ainda vigorava o Decreto-Lei 177/86, de 2 de Julho.