Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0121420 AI generated

Arrest requires proof of dissipation or alienation of assets to justify creditor's fear of losing security.

Case Number 0121420
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto dismissed the appeal, confirming the lower court's decision to deny the arrest. The creditor argued for the measure based on a fear of asset dissipation, while the debtor contested the lack of concrete evidence. The court ruled that mere fear is insufficient; the creditor must prove specific facts showing the debtor's intent to hide or alienate assets.

Legislator headnote

Official

ARRESTO JUSTO RECEIO DE EXTRAVIO OU DISSIPAÇÃO DE BENS FACTOS

Keywords

AI generated
arrest of assets justified fear requirement dissipation of property alienation of goods creditor security procedural caution burden of proof

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC95 Art. 406 n.º 1
CPC95 Art. 407 n.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00033418

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200111200121420

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 318/01

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J PENAFIEL 4J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/89F77AF4631382EB80256B65003E9769?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O "justificado receio" (de que fala a lei a propósito do arresto) de o credor perder a garantia patrimonial do seu crédito, se não exige uma efectiva dissipação ou alienação dos seus bens, exige, pelo menos, alegação e prova de factos que revelem, por parte do devedor, a disposição de ocultar ou alienar os bens, só assim se justificando o receio do credor.