Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0212285 AI generated

Defense's refusal request dismissed due to lack of concrete facts proving special gravity and judicial bias.

Case Number 0212285
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defense's request to refuse the presiding judge, finding the allegations insufficient to meet the legal threshold. The defense argued the judge had participated criminally against them, but failed to provide concrete facts demonstrating special gravity or reasonable doubt regarding impartiality. Consequently, the court ruled that without specific evidence of such serious misconduct, the request for judicial recusal was legally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECUSA ÓNUS DA ALEGAÇÃO REQUISITOS

Keywords

AI generated
judicial recusal request special gravity standard impartiality doubt concrete factual allegations defense refusal motion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPP98 Art. 43, n.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00035324

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200212040212285

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 653/00

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 1 J CR PAREDES

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/88BAACA31735FE3C80256CC2002A0603?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

No requerimento de recusa há sempre que alegar factos concretos que constituam motivo de especial gravidade e que possam gerar desconfiança sobre a imparcialidade do juiz.

É infundado o requerimento em que o arguido suscita a recusa do juiz do julgamento, em que alegou ter participado criminalmente contra este, sem todavia ter aduzido factos concretos da autoria do requerido que se revistam daquela "especial gravidade" geradora de desconfiança.