Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9250725 AI generated

Court allows proceeding for cheque fraud, ruling property damage is inherent to non-payment.

Case Number 9250725
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto ordered the continuation of the criminal proceedings regarding the issuance of an unpaid cheque. Although the prosecution's indictment did not explicitly mention the financial loss, the court found that property damage is an inherent consequence of the cheque's non-payment. Consequently, the court ruled that the omission in the indictment does not preclude the trial, as the damage is integral to the alleged facts.

Legislator headnote

Official

CHEQUE SEM PROVISÃO DANOS PATRIMONIAIS ELEMENTO CONSTITUTIVO SUCESSÃO DE LEIS NO TEMPO OBJECTO DO PROCESSO

Keywords

AI generated
issuance unpaid cheque property damage inherent non-payment consequence criminal proceedings continuation indictment omission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
D. 13004 de 1927/01/12, art. 23, n.º 1
DL 454/91 de 1991/12/28, art. 11, n.º 1

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ de 1993/01/27
AC RP PROC9330336

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 10/16/1991

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00009797

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199306099250725

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 155/92-1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J BRAGA 4J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/7EC4EB6F4F3701C08025686B00666ABB?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Relativamente ao crime de emissão de cheque sem provisão, o prejuízo patrimonial é conatural do não pagamento do cheque, está ínsito ou faz parte dos factos apontados na acusação, apesar de nesta não se aludir expressamente a tal prejuízo, pelo que impõe-se o prosseguimento do processo para julgamento.