Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0130968 AI generated

Preferential right requires total agricultural aptitude; partial exercise allowed only if fractionation is possible.

Case Number 0130968
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court confirmed the lower sentence regarding the exercise of the preferential right on a bordering property. The plaintiff argued for partial acquisition, while the defendant contended the property lacked total agricultural suitability. The court ruled that while total aptitude is fundamental, partial exercise is permissible provided the property can be legally fractionated.

Legislator headnote

Official

DIREITO DE PREFERÊNCIA FRACCIONAMENTO DA PROPRIEDADE RÚSTICA PRÉDIO CONFINANTE

Keywords

AI generated
preferential right bordering properties agricultural aptitude property fractionation civil code provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CCIV Art. 1380
CCIV Art. 1381
CCIV Art. 1377

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ DE 1994/06/21 IN CJSTJ T2 ANOII PAG155

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00032680

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200106280130968

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 1 J CIV BARCELOS

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/7B4D475FD30859C080256AE800308A8B?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Requisito fundamental para o exercício do direito de preferência entre prédios confinantes é que os mesmos sejam considerados na sua totalidade aptos para o cultivo agrícola.

II - Admitindo-se a possibilidade do exercício da preferência sobre parte do prédio, essa legitimidade depende de o prédio poder ser objecto de fraccionamento.