Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9230990 AI generated

Court holds driving ban is a security measure requiring defendant's presence for fine or security measure transgression trials.

Case Number 9230990
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto annulled a judgment regarding the defendant's absence from a trial concerning a driving ban and fine. The court established that a driving ban constitutes a security measure, not a penalty, under established doctrine. Consequently, the defendant's mandatory presence was required for the hearing of transgressions involving both penalties and security measures.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROCESSO DE TRANSGRESSÃO AUDIÊNCIA DE JULGAMENTO ARGUIDO COMPARÊNCIA NO TRIBUNAL INIBIÇÃO DA FACULDADE DE CONDUZIR MEDIDA DE SEGURANÇA NULIDADE ABSOLUTA

Keywords

AI generated
security measure classification mandatory defendant presence driving ban transgression penalty vs security measure first instance hearing requirement CPP Article 119 DL 17/91 provisions

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPP Art. 119
DL 17/91 Art. 4(1)
DL 17/91 Art. 5(1)(a)
DL 17/91 Art. 10(1)(2)
DL 17/91 Art. 9(2)
DL 17/91 Art. 11(3)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Court of Justice, 29 April 1992

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00007280

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199302249230990

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[REFERENCIA DE PUBLICACAO] CJ T1 ANOXVIII PAG257

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T POL PORTO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/5E84E2AC73CD27D48025686B0066566C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - A inibição da faculdade de conduzir, face à doutrina firmada no Assento do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça de 29 de Abril de 1992, é considerada uma medida de segurança.

II - Correspondendo à transgressão pena de multa e/ou medida de segurança é obrigatória a presença do arguido, em primeira marcação, em julgamento.