Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9230382 AI generated

Portuguese court annuls criminal judgment for failure to list proven and unproven facts as required by law.

Case Number 9230382
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto annulled a criminal judgment because the trial judge failed to enumerate proven and unproven facts in the verdict. The prosecution argued the omission violated procedural requirements, while the defense sought to uphold the decision's validity. The court ruled that such a failure constitutes a nullity under the Code of Criminal Procedure, necessitating a retrial.

Legislator headnote

Official

SENTENÇA PENAL REQUISITOS FUNDAMENTAÇÃO FACTOS NULIDADE

Keywords

AI generated
criminal judgment nullity enumeration of facts proven and unproven facts Code of Criminal Procedure retrial requirement fundamental reasoning procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 374 no. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 379-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 328 no. 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 122 no. 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC RP PROC9210138 DE 1992/04/01
AC STJ DE 1991/06/05 IN CJ ANOXVI T3 PAG33

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 03/10/1992

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00005982

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199206039230382

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 4350-1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T POL PORTO 2J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/5C3FC54785DFEBFC8025686B006649CB?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O Código de Processo Penal, no seu artigo 374 nº 2, impõe ao juiz a fundamentação da sentença nas suas vertentes de facto e de direito, exigindo, na primeira delas, a enumeração dos factos provados e não provados, o que, a não ser observado, acarretará nulidade da sentença ( artigo 379-A ) e determinará a repetição do julgamento no juízo " a quo " ( artigos 328, nº 6, e 122, nº 1 ).