Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0050888 AI generated

Movable seizure requires no explicit judicial order for dispossessing goods and delivering them to the custodian.

Case Number 0050888
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal regarding the procedural necessity of an explicit judicial order for the dispossessing and delivery of seized movable goods. The appellant argued that such acts required a separate judicial decree beyond the initial seizure order. The court ruled that these actions are legally inherent to the seizure process and are validly authorized by the original judicial order itself.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXECUÇÃO PENHORA MÓVEIS REMOÇÃO DEPOSITÁRIO

Keywords

AI generated
movable seizure procedure dispossessing goods custodian delivery explicit judicial order execution of seizure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC 1995, Art. 848, n.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00030100

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP200010160050888

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 24-B/00

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J FELGUEIRAS 1J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/551DA7E3DF2C7D7F802569D1003C26CF?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Na penhora de bens móveis (como no arresto), o desapossamento dos bens e a sua entrega ao depositário não têm de constar de despacho explícito do juiz pois resultam da lei e estão legitimados pelo despacho que ordena o acto judicial.