Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9450575 AI generated

Judge's subsequent order to describe disputed assets violates the principle of extinction of jurisdictional power.

Case Number 9450575
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto allowed the appeal against a judge's order to describe specific assets in an inventory proceeding. The lower court had initially remitted the case to common means due to a disagreement over excluding certain items from the asset list. The court ruled that issuing a subsequent order to describe those same items violated the principle of extinction of jurisdictional power established in Article 666, paragraph 1, of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

Official

EXTINÇÃO DO PODER JURISDICIONAL

Keywords

AI generated
extinction of jurisdictional power inventory proceeding disputed asset description Civil Procedure Code judicial finality principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 666, n. 1 do Código de Processo Civil

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 04/19/1994

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00012316

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199410069450575

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 3-B/92

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J S JOÃO PESQUEIRA

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/4F4C1604E9EE71348025686B006698AC?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Proferido despacho num processo de inventário a remeter os interessados para os meios comuns, por desacordo quanto à exclusão de algumas verbas constantes da relação de bens, não é lícito ao juiz proferir ulteriormente outro despacho a ordenar a descrição daquelas verbas, assim dando o dito por não dito, pois ao alterar o despacho inicial o juiz violou o princípio da extinção do poder jurisdicional inserido no artigo 666, n. 1 do Código de Processo Civil.