Legislator Case Law & Legislation
9330450 AI generated

Civil court fees remain the defendant's burden even after paying criminal debt due to subsequent civil claim.

Case Number 9330450
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto upheld the imposition of court fees on the defendant following a civil claim filed after a criminal debt was settled. The court found that the defendant's payment of the criminal debt did not extinguish the obligation to pay civil litigation costs, as the subsequent civil proceeding was a distinct legal matter. Consequently, the court ruled that the defendant remains liable for the fees incurred in the civil process, citing the principle of autonomy between criminal and civil proceedings regarding cost allocation.

Legislator headnote

Official

PROCESSO PENAL PEDIDO CÍVEL PAGAMENTO CUSTAS RESPONSABILIDADE

Keywords

AI generated
civil court fees criminal debt payment procedural autonomy litigation costs subsequent civil claim Código de Processo Civil defendant liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 447 nº 1 do Código de Processo Civil
artigo 447 nº 1 do Código de Processo Civil
( artigo 447 nº 1 do Código de Processo Civil ).

Cited Case Law

AI generated
ASS STJ DE 1993/01/27
AC RP PROC9240549 DE 1992/11/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00010701

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199307079330450

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 276/93-1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J STO TIRSO

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/466920F3C2EBBA2C8025686B00666FA9?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O " assento " do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça de 27/01/93 consagra a autonomia, em matéria de custas, do processo cível em relação ao processo penal onde se exerta.

II - Tendo o arguido pago a importância em dívida após a formulação do pedido cível, a inutilidade superveniente daí resultante é-lhe imputável e, assim,

é sobre ele que impende o encargo das custas

( artigo 447 nº 1 do Código de Processo Civil ).