Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
9150585 AI generated

Portuguese court denies preventive detention appeal for drug trafficking where social alarm and lack of illness justify the measure.

Case Number 9150585
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto dismissed the appeal against preventive detention, confirming the lower court's decision to keep the defendant incarcerated. The defendant was charged with drug trafficking, evidenced by drugs found on their person, seized cash, and their own statements, which carried a potential sentence of six to twelve years. The court ruled that the social alarm caused by the crime and the absence of any medical condition necessitating release made the detention measure necessary and justified.

Legislator headnote

Official

PRISãO PREVENTIVA TRAFICO DE ESTUPEFACIENTE

Keywords

AI generated
preventive detention drug trafficking social alarm procedural appeal necessity of measure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPP Art. 209
DL 430/83 Art. 23, n.º 1

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC RL DE 1988/06/03 IN BMJ N368 PAG602
AC STJ DE 1988/02/02 IN BMJ N378 PAG376

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00002510

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199108079150585

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T J MARCO CANAVESES

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/2EFEC7FADEBB61968025686B00664CCE?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Indiciando o material probatorio coligido no inquerito -droga encontrada no bolso, dinheiro apreendido e declarações do participante - a pratica dum crime punivel com pena de prisão de 6 a 12 anos e atento o alarme social e desassossego que a actuação delitiva causou no meio, a prisão preventiva imposta e a medida que se revela necessaria, não vindo demonstrado que o recorrente padeça de doença que a desaconselhe.