Portuguese criminal appeal rejected for lack of required written conclusions and motivation. The court dismissed the appeal due to procedural non-compliance. The decision emphasizes strict adherence to statutory requirements for appellate submissions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Tribunal da Relação do Porto rejected the criminal appeal because the appellant failed to submit the required written conclusions and motivation. The appellant argued for a review of the lower court's decision, but the opposing party contended that the absence of these documents rendered the appeal procedurally defective. The court ruled that without the mandatory conclusions, the appeal was deemed unmotivated and therefore inadmissible under the Criminal Procedure Code.
Legislator headnote
OfficialRECURSO PENAL MOTIVAÇÃO CONCLUSÕES REJEIÇÃO DE RECURSO
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 01/16/1991
[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00003721
[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199204089250165
[PRIVACIDADE] 1
[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 328/91-A
[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N
[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T CR PORTO 1J
[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/0F44F83EE2D8EEE08025686B00662854?OpenDocument
SUMÁRIO
O recurso a que faltam as conclusões da respectiva motivação, deve ser considerado como não motivado e, consequentemente, rejeitado.