Legislator Case Law & Legislation
9250165 AI generated

Portuguese criminal appeal rejected for lack of required written conclusions and motivation. The court dismissed the appeal due to procedural non-compliance. The decision emphasizes strict adherence to statutory requirements for appellate submissions.

Case Number 9250165
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação do Porto rejected the criminal appeal because the appellant failed to submit the required written conclusions and motivation. The appellant argued for a review of the lower court's decision, but the opposing party contended that the absence of these documents rendered the appeal procedurally defective. The court ruled that without the mandatory conclusions, the appeal was deemed unmotivated and therefore inadmissible under the Criminal Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO PENAL MOTIVAÇÃO CONCLUSÕES REJEIÇÃO DE RECURSO

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure missing written conclusions lack of motivation procedural inadmissibility Criminal Procedure Code appellate review requirements unmotivated appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPP Art. 411(3)
CPP Art. 412(1)
CPP Art. 420(1)
CPP Art. 420(2)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[DATA DEC. RECORRIDA] 01/16/1991

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRP00003721

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RP199204089250165

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] 328/91-A

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECORRIDO] T CR PORTO 1J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrp.nsf/56a6e7121657f91e80257cda00381fdf/0F44F83EE2D8EEE08025686B00662854?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O recurso a que faltam as conclusões da respectiva motivação, deve ser considerado como não motivado e, consequentemente, rejeitado.