Social deliberation suspension requires appreciable damage; alleged nullity is irrelevant to the suspension's justification.

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa confirmed the suspension of a social deliberation, ruling that the alleged nullity was irrelevant to the suspension's validity. The court held that suspension is only justified if an appreciable damage to the execution of the deliberation is proven. Consequently, the request to suspend proceedings based solely on the nullity claim was granted due to the lack of demonstrated appreciable harm.