Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0067476 AI generated

Non-pecuniary damages claim dismissed for failure to prove specific nature and gravity of alleged moral injuries.

Case Number 0067476
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa dismissed the appeal regarding a claim for non-pecuniary damages, ruling that not all inconveniences warrant compensation. The court emphasized that the plaintiff failed to concretely describe the specific facts and nature of the alleged moral injuries, noting that 'inconvenience' is a conclusory term requiring detailed proof. Consequently, the court held that without specific allegations demonstrating the legal gravity of the claimed harms, no tutelable injury was established.

Legislator headnote

Official

DANOS NÃO PATRIMONIAIS DANOS MORAIS RESSARCIMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
non-pecuniary damages moral damages burden of proof specific facts required legal gravity of harm tutela judicial failure to allege

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CCIV.66
Art. 496, n.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00014653

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199403240067476

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/F6902EB45BC80AC9802568030002490C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Embora não sejam de ressarcir todos e quaisquer incómodos pode acontecer que alguns tenham tal intensidade e tal grandeza que façam juz a essa tutela.

II - Porém, para que o Tribunal possa aquilatar, em cada caso, se os invocados incómodos têm gravidade juridicamente tutelável, necessário se torna alegar e provar em que consistiram eles, em concreto, ou seja, descrever os factos respectivos, já que "incómodos" é um termo conclusivo.