Legislator Case Law & Legislation
0064164 AI generated

Labor contract clause extending probation period is void; dismissal without disciplinary process is invalid.

Case Number 0064164
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa declared the appeal against the dismissal dismissed. The court found the contract clause extending the probation period from 15 to 30 days void as it violated Article 5 of the Decree-Law 781/86. Furthermore, the employer's claim that nine consecutive absences justified termination was rejected because no disciplinary process was initiated.

Legislator headnote

Official

CONTRATO DE TRABALHO A PRAZO PERÍODO EXPERIMENTAL ALTERAÇÃO DO PRAZO NULIDADE FALTAS PROCESSO DISCIPLINAR DESPEDIMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
labor contract probation period statutory compliance nullity disciplinary process requirement fixed-term employment law unjustified dismissal invalidity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 5 of Decree-Law 781/86

Cited Case Law

AI generated
STJ Decision of 14 February 1986, N 296, p. 1089

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00015730

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199005300064164

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/F07FDADCF25B9013802568030003C668?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Está ferida de nulidade a cláusula do contrato de trabalho a prazo que estabelece o alargamento do prazo experimental de 15 dias para 30 dias, por ser contrária ao disposto no artigo 5 do Decreto-Lei n. 781/86.

II - Não basta alegar que o A. deu nove faltas em dias inteiros, seguidos, se não foi instaurado processo disciplinar, sendo tal alegação irrelevante para justificar o despedimento.