Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0093461 AI generated

Documentary remittance does not replace the burden of alleging facts in the initial petition.

Case Number 0093461
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court allowed the initial petition despite the defendant's request for a partial dismissal based on documentary remittance. The plaintiff alleged facts while submitting documents to prove them, arguing that the remittance serves only as proof. The court ruled that the initial petition must contain the allegations themselves, as the remittance does not substitute the burden of stating facts.

Legislator headnote

Official

PETIÇÃO INICIAL ÓNUS DA ALEGAÇÃO REMISSÃO DOCUMENTO

Keywords

AI generated
documentary remittance initial petition burden of allegation partial dismissal civil procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 474 n. 1
CPC67 Art. 474 n. 2
artigo 474 do CPC
2 do artigo 474 do CPC não

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC RL DE 1982/05/11 IN CJ ANO1982 T3 PAG92
AC RL DE 1988/09/20 IN CJ ANO1988 T4 PAG115

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00018856

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199506270093461

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/ECB3BBC2F8209640802568030002DF9E?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - A remissão documental não substitui o ónus de alegar os correspondentes factos na petição inicial, servindo apenas para os comprovar.

II - Face ao disposto no n. 2 do artigo 474 do CPC não

é possível o indeferimento liminar parcial (parcial) da petição inicial na hipótese de cumulação de pedidos contra o mesmo réu.