Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0080651 AI generated

Provisional proceedings require proof of facts but not the burden of proof to be met.

Case Number 0080651
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa allowed the appeal regarding the evidentiary standards in provisional proceedings. The court clarified that while the burden of proof remains on the applicant to allege all necessary facts, the threshold for proving those facts is merely indicatory rather than conclusive. Consequently, the judge may base the decision on the alleged facts supported by such indicatory evidence.

Legislator headnote

Official

ARRESTO PRINCÍPIO DISPOSITIVO

Keywords

AI generated
provisional proceedings burden of proof indicatory evidence civil procedure code evidentiary threshold

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC 67 Art. 264 n.º 3
CPC 67 Art. 664

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00018712

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199412150080651

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/B531FF78CD67F095802568030002DA44?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Embora nos procedimentos cautelares a prova seja meramente indiciária, tal só significa menores exigências quanto à força probatória dos meios de prova oferecidos, mas não quanto ao ónus de alegação, tendo o requerente de alegar todos os factos necessários para fundamentar o direito que invoca e só neles se podendo basear o o Juiz.