Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0024522 AI generated

Main intervention by building owners in a commercial establishment claim is inadmissible under civil procedure law.

Case Number 0024522
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa declared the main intervention incident inadmissible in a commercial establishment claim. The building owners argued for participation as primary intervenors, but the court found no legal basis for their involvement. Consequently, the court ruled that such an incident cannot be admitted in this specific type of action.

Legislator headnote

Official

REIVINDICAÇÃO ESTABELECIMENTO COMERCIAL INTERVENÇÃO PRINCIPAL PROPRIETÁRIO PRÉDIO

Keywords

AI generated
commercial establishment claim main intervention incident building owners participation civil procedure admissibility property rights dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 27, n.º 1
CPC67 Art. 351-A
CPC67 Art. 359
CCIV66 Art. 1037, n.º 2
CCIV66 Art. 1085
CCIV66 Art. 1311

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ DE 1974/07/09 IN BMJ N239 PAG136

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00021352

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199010180024522

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/A3E07AFFF712CDBA802568030003486F?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Em acção de reivindicação de estabelecimento comercial não é admissível o incidente de intervenção principal, requerido pelos alegados proprietários do prédio onde funciona o estabelecimento.