Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0093359 AI generated

Post-payment of misappropriated funds does not negate abuse of confidence but only mitigates punishment.

Case Number 0093359
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa dismissed the appeal regarding a conviction for abuse of confidence. The prosecution argued that the defendant's subsequent payment of the misappropriated funds in installments demonstrated a lack of intent to permanently deprive the victim. The court held that while this post-crime conduct is relevant for sentencing, it does not erase the objective and subjective elements required to establish the crime of abuse of confidence.

Legislator headnote

Official

ABUSO DE CONFIANÇA PAGAMENTO EM PRESTAÇÕES MEDIDA DA PENA ATENUANTES

Keywords

AI generated
abuse of confidence subsequent payment mitigating circumstances criminal intent property crime sentencing reduction criminal liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CP 98 Art. 205(1), (4)
CP 98 Art. 206
CPP 98 Art. 308(1)
CPP 98 Art. 513
CPP 98 Art. 514
CCJ 96 Art. 87(1)(b)

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ DE 1997/10/15 IN CJ STJ ANOV T3

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00047597

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL200301160093359

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/9F74EB71D20B314680256CFB0045B261?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

O posterior pagamento em prestações da quantia indevidamente e/ou abusivamente apropriada, não neutraliza o preenchimento dos elementos objectivos e subjectivos do abuso de confiança, apenas podendo ser levado em conta na graduação da pena.