Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0069952 AI generated

Appeal dismissed because grounds were not minimally attacked and fell outside the scope of reviewable issues.

Case Number 0069952
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa unanimously dismissed the appeal against the first-instance decision. The appellant failed to minimally attack the decision's grounds in the required conclusions, rendering the appeal inadmissible under the specific scope of review defined by the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the court held that the appeal was outside the ambit of the decision it sought to challenge.

Legislator headnote

Official

RECURSO OBJECTO CONCLUSÕES

Keywords

AI generated
minimally attack grounds scope of review admissibility of appeal conclusions requirement CPC review limits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 690, n. 1 CPC
Art. 684, n. 3 CPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00012599

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199310280069952

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[PROCESSO NO TRIBUNAL RECURSO] 9203B/92

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[TRIBUNAL RECURSO] T CIV LISBOA 5J

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/97FC4B2F2DBFABA1802568030001E236?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

Se os fundamentos da decisão recorrida não são minimamente atacados pelo recorrente - maxime nas conclusões - o recurso tem de improceder, uma vez que o âmbito deste, definido nos termos dos artigos 690, n.

1 e 684, n. 3 do Código Processo Civil, se acha desenquadrado da decisão impugnada, a qual em nada é por ele afectada.