Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0084962 AI generated

Third-party objections only suspend execution; preliminary orders on timeliness must address substantive issues.

Case Number 0084962
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa dismissed the appeal regarding third-party objections to an execution proceeding. The court held that only the granting of such objections suspends the execution process, while preliminary orders on timeliness must explicitly rule on the substantive issue if they are to be considered resolved. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the preliminary order failed to address the core question of the creditor's claim timeliness.

Legislator headnote

Official

EMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO RECLAMAÇÃO DE CRÉDITOS DESPACHO LIMINAR

Keywords

AI generated
third-party objections execution suspension preliminary orders timeliness of claims procedural requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 479 n.º 2
CPC67 Art. 869
CPC67 Art. 1041 n.º 2

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00021125

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199510120084962

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/37E3293FEFD2D0148025680300033D7C?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Só a procedência dos embargos de terceiro suspende a execução.

II - As questões que podem ser objecto de indeferimento liminar, nomeadamente a de extemporaneidade de reclamação de créditos, não podem considerar-se arrumadas com o despacho liminar, se este se não pronunciou sobre elas.