Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0045152 AI generated

Third-party objections to provisional possession restitution are admissible, but spouses share risks of the other's activity.

Case Number 0045152
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the third-party objections filed against a provisional order for the return of possession. The respondent's spouse, residing with the possessor, argued as a third party, claiming distinct legal standing despite their marital relationship. The court held that while third-party objections are procedurally admissible, a spouse is bound by the consequences of their partner's actions within the conjugal society.

Legislator headnote

Official

RESTITUIÇÃO PROVISÓRIA DE POSSE EMBARGOS DE TERCEIRO

Keywords

AI generated
provisional possession restitution third party objections marital community risks conjugal society obligations procedural admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC67 Art. 1037 n.º 1

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00016672

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199102210045152

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/2DBFD5FFB30CA0468025680300027B92?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - Contra a providência cautelar de restituição provisória de posse são admissíveis embargos de terceiro.

II - O cônjuge do requerido esbulhador, que com ele reside, embora sendo terceiro, tenderá a comungar nos "comoda" e "incomoda" que da actividade do seu cônjuge adviriam para a sociedade conjugal.