Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
00105619 AI generated

Preventive detention upheld when risks of flight and evidence tampering cannot be mitigated by other coercive measures.

Case Number 00105619
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa dismissed the appeal against the preventive detention order, upholding the lower court's decision. The prosecution argued that specific risks of flight and evidence tampering could not be mitigated by any measure other than detention. The court agreed, ruling that once these risks are established as insusceptible to other safeguards, no further justification for each insufficiency is required.

Legislator headnote

Official

PRISÃO PREVENTIVA PRESSUPOSTOS FUNDAMENTAÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
preventive detention coercive measures evidence tampering flight risk procedural appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPP98 Art. 191(1), (3)
CPP98 Art. 193(2), (3)
CPP98 Art. 202(1), A
CPP98 Art. 204, B
Constitution 2001 Art. 28(2)
Constitution 2001 Art. 32(2)
Law 15/2001 Art. 89(2)
Law 15/2001 Art. 93
Law 15/2001 Art. 95
Law 15/2001 Art. 96
Law 15/2001 Art. 103(1), A, B, C
Law 15/2001 Art. 104(1), D, E
DL 376-A/1989 Art. 22
DL 376-A/1989 Art. 23, D
DL 376-A/1989 Art. 28

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00037871

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL2001120600105619

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/2C411F0F5003DFDF80256BCF0046DAED?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A conclusão, devidamente apoiada em factos, de que os perigos verificados - alguns de perturbação da prova e de fuga - são insusceptíveis de serem salvaguardados por qualquer outra medida de coacção que não a prisão preventiva, contem expressão do juízo sobre a insuficiência de todas as outras, não havendo que justificar, uma a uma, os porquês dessa insuficiência.