Legislator Case Law & Legislation
00123417 AI generated

Bank secrecy is not absolute and must yield to the constitutional right of access to justice.

Case Number 00123417
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa dismissed the appeal regarding a request to access bank records. The court held that while bank secrecy and access to justice are both constitutionally protected, the latter prevails when the general interest requires judicial administration of the case. Consequently, the restriction on bank secrecy was found to be justified by the necessity of ensuring the proper functioning of the judicial process.

Legislator headnote

Official

SIGILO BANCÁRIO ACESSO AO DIREITO

Keywords

AI generated
bank secrecy access to justice constitutional rights judicial administration general interest procedural law constitutional supremacy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPC art. 266 n.º 4
CRP art. 202 n.º 1
CRP art. 202 n.º 2
CRP art. 205 n.º 2
DL 298/92 art. 78
DL 298/92 art. 79

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AC STJ DE 21/03/2000
AC RL DE 14/11/2000
AC RL DE 04/01/2001

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00040047

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL2002030500123417

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/2BAEADF7DAD703C980256BA70032AE48?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O sigilo bancário não é um direito absoluto.

II - Daí que deve ceder perante o direito de acesso à Justiça e o dever que lhe é inerente - o de ser administrada pelos Tribunais.

III - É que, estando em causa dois valores, ambos constitucionalmente consagrados, deve sempre prevalecer aquele que tem em vista a salvaguarda do interesse geral face a interesses meramente particulares.