Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0096952 AI generated

Court rules that cancelling auction charges is always required regardless of the buyer's identity and must be ordered by the executing judge.

Case Number 0096952
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa unanimously allowed the appeal regarding the cancellation of charges in an auction proceeding. The court held that such cancellation must always be ordered, irrespective of whether the auction buyer is the executing creditor or a third party. Consequently, the judge presiding over the execution process is the sole authority competent to issue the necessary order.

Legislator headnote

Official

ARREMATAÇÃO CANCELAMENTO DE INSCRIÇÃO

Keywords

AI generated
auction charge cancellation execution process judge auction buyer identity property inscription removal executive proceeding order

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CCiv.66 Art. 824 n.º 2
CCiv.66 Art. 868
CCiv.66 Art. 877
CCiv.66 Art. 878
CPC.67 Art. 907

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00016830

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199504060096952

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/256AD88650ADFFCC8025680300028237?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

I - O cancelamento de encargos inscritos tem sempre de ser ordenados, independentemente de o arrematante ser ou não o exequente ou credor hipotecário;

II - É ao juiz do processo executivo, onde se ordenou a venda que compete proferir tal despacho.