Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
0056405 AI generated

Portuguese court upholds preventive detention during quarterly review, ruling pre-trial hearing not mandatory.

Case Number 0056405
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Portugal (PT)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa rejected the request to review preventive detention, ruling that the factual and legal grounds remained unchanged. The defense argued for mandatory pre-trial hearings for both the accused and the public prosecutor during quarterly reviews. The court decided that such hearings are only required if the judge deems them necessary, affirming the standard formula of maintaining detention without automatic hearings.

Legislator headnote

Official

REEXAME DOS PRESSUPOSTOS DA PRISÃO PREVENTIVA AUDIÊNCIA DO ARGUIDO PRESENÇA DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO

Keywords

AI generated
preventive detention review quarterly detention hearing mandatory pre-trial audit public prosecutor presence unchanged legal grounds

Cited Legislation

AI generated
CPP Art. 204
CPP Art. 212
CPP Art. 213
Constitution Art. 32
European Convention on Human Rights Art. 6

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

[Nº CONVENCIONAL] JTRL00025017

[Nº DO DOCUMENTO] RL199809290056405

[PRIVACIDADE] 1

[TEXTO INTEGRAL] N

[URL] https://www.dgsi.pt/jtrl.nsf/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec/149B93ECAC80213F80256A7E0053ADDB?OpenDocument

SUMÁRIO

A manutenção da prisão preventiva, em reexame trimestral, "por inalterados os pressupostos de facto e de direito", é licita, sendo, tal fórmula tabelar, simples, completa e unívoca.

Não é exigível a pré-audição do arguido, e/ou Mº Pº, em todos os casos de reexame trimestral, só ocorrendo tal audição se o juiz a considerar necessária.